Sydni R. Bell · California Real Estate
Housing on the ballot
Your quick guide to voting in person in Sacramento County and to the 14 propositions on the November 3 ballot, starting with the four that touch housing.
- Election Day Tuesday, Nov 3
- Vote center hours 7 AM to 8 PM
- Sacramento County Vote at any vote center
Step one
Where to vote
Every vote center in Sacramento County is open through Election Day. You can go to any one, not just the closest. Tap Directions to open a map.
Elk Grove vote centers
- Elk Grove Library9260 Elk Grove BlvdDirections
- The Center at District568230 Civic Center DrDirections
- Elk Grove City Council Chambers8400 Laguna Palms WayDirections
- Elk Grove Space 4 Art2350 Maritime DrDirections
- Franklin Community Library10055 Franklin High RdDirections
- Elk Grove United Methodist Church8986 Elk Grove BlvdDirections
- Edward Harris Jr. Middle School8691 Power Inn RdDirections
- Laguna Creek Sports Club9570 Racquet CtDirections
- Wackford Community and Aquatic Complex9014 Bruceville RdDirections
Sacramento vote centers
- California Museum1020 O StDirections
- Oak Park Community Center3425 Martin Luther King Jr BlvdDirections
- Greater Sacramento Urban League3725 Marysville BlvdDirections
- The East Jay Building5025 J St, Ste 102 (park off 51st St)Directions
- Richard T. Conzelmann Community Center2201 Cottage WayDirections
- Lutheran Church of Our Redeemer4641 Marconi AveDirections
- Dept. of Human Assistance, Florin2450 Florin RdDirections
- St. Luke's Lutheran Church7595 Center Pkwy (enter from Tangerine Ave)Directions
- APAPA Natomas4000 Truxel Rd, Ste 3Directions
- Christ Temple Apostolic Church9000 La Riviera Dr (enter from Tuolumne Dr)Directions
- Pat O'Brien Community Center8025 Waterman RdDirections
Sacramento has 37 more vote centers. See the full list on the county site below.
Hours before Election Day vary by site. On Election Day every vote center is open 7 AM to 8 PM.
Step two
Know before you go
Not registered? You can register and vote the same day at any vote center.
Moved within the county? Update your address in person at a vote center.
Have a mail ballot? Drop it off at any vote center. Many offer drive-thru drop-off.
First-time voter? Bring a photo ID in case you're asked for one.
Need help voting? Every vote center has accessible voting machines and curbside voting.
Check your registration. voterstatus.sos.ca.gov
Step three
Props that affect housing
Tap a prop to see what it does, what a Yes or No vote means and what it costs.
PROP 1
Housing affordability bond
$11.25 billion for affordable housing and veterans' home loansLets the state borrow $11.25 billion through bonds for housing. The money would go to rental housing, veterans' home loans, supportive housing, homeownership and down payment help, and other housing programs.
- YES
- The state could borrow $11.25 billion to support veterans and affordable housing.
- NO
- The state could not borrow the $11.25 billion.
Cost: About $500 million to $600 million a year from the state General Fund for roughly 25 years to repay the bonds.
PROP 37
Loans for middle-income buyers of new homes
Up to $25 billion for fixed-rate mortgages on new homesAllows up to $25 billion in bonds to fund fixed-rate mortgages for eligible buyers of newly built homes priced below about $1.5 million. Buyers must be California residents who live in the home, meet income limits and put at least 3% down. Mortgage payments, not the state, would repay the bonds.
- YES
- The state could sell up to $25 billion in revenue bonds to fund the program.
- NO
- The state would not be required to create this homebuying program.
Cost: No direct state or local costs.
PROP 45
Environmental review for certain projects
Faster CEQA review for most housing and other projectsChanges the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to speed up review of projects such as most housing, transportation, water and health projects. It sets deadlines for reviews and lawsuits and narrows what courts can consider.
- YES
- Certain public and private projects could use new review and court challenge procedures.
- NO
- Projects would keep using the current review and court challenge procedures.
Cost: Likely high tens of millions of dollars a year at first for state and local governments, possibly over $100 million, partly covered by fees.
PROP 43
Vote needed to pass some local taxes
Two-thirds approval for voter-proposed local special taxesStarting January 1, 2027, local special taxes proposed by voters would need two-thirds approval to pass instead of a simple majority.
Why it's here: some communities use local special taxes to fund housing programs.
- YES
- Certain local taxes would need two-thirds voter approval.
- NO
- Those local taxes could still pass with a majority vote.
Cost: Local tax revenue may not grow as much because some taxes would need more votes to pass.
Step four
The other 10 propositions
These don't focus on housing, but they're on the same ballot.
PROP 2
Increases the state's rainy day fund
Bigger state savings fund and longer extra debt paymentsRaises the target size of the state's emergency savings fund from 10% to 20% of General Fund revenue. It also requires extra savings in high-revenue years and extends required extra debt payments through 2040.
- YES
- State budget reserves would be higher, and the state would make extra debt payments for longer.
- NO
- The rules for building reserves and paying down extra state debt stay the same.
Cost: State budget reserves would end up higher than under current rules.
PROP 3
Extends the tax on high incomes for schools and health care
Makes the 2012 high-earner tax rates permanentMakes permanent the higher income tax rates on high earners that voters approved in 2012, which are set to expire in 2031. The money would mainly go to K–12 schools and community colleges, with more for health care and other programs.
- YES
- The income tax increase on high earners in place since 2012 becomes permanent.
- NO
- That tax increase expires in 2031.
Cost: Keeps $5 billion to $15 billion a year in state income tax revenue that would otherwise end in 2031.
PROP 4
Repeals the ban on public funding of election campaigns
Lets governments create public campaign financingRemoves the state ban on using public money for candidate campaigns. State and local governments could choose to create public campaign financing programs. Those programs could not use money set aside for education, transportation or public safety.
- YES
- State and local governments could create public campaign financing programs for candidates.
- NO
- State and local governments still could not create these programs.
Cost: A few hundred thousand dollars a year so the Fair Political Practices Commission can advise governments on these programs.
PROP 5
Changes the recall process for statewide officers
Removes the replacement question from recall ballotsToday, a recall ballot also asks voters who should replace the official. This measure removes that question. The vacancy would be filled by a special election or an appointment instead.
- YES
- Recall elections would no longer include a question about who should fill the vacancy.
- NO
- Voters would still be asked who should fill the vacancy in a recall election.
Cost: Unknown. A recall could save or cost millions of dollars depending on the office.
PROP 38
Bonds for immunology medical research
$8.4 billion for immunology and immunotherapy researchAllows $8.4 billion in bonds for immunology and immunotherapy research. Half would go to one University of California–affiliated nonprofit research institute. The other half would fund research grants.
- YES
- The state could borrow $8.4 billion for immunology and immunotherapy research.
- NO
- The state could not borrow the $8.4 billion.
Cost: About $500 million to $600 million a year for roughly 20 years. Research revenue could offset some or all of it.
PROP 39
Requires government-issued ID to vote
ID in person and ID digits on mail ballotsVoters would have to show government-issued ID to vote in person. Mail ballots would not count unless the envelope includes the last four digits of a government-issued ID number.
- YES
- Voters would have to give election officials more identifying information each time they vote.
- NO
- A voter's identity would still be confirmed by their signature.
Cost: Tens of millions to low hundreds of millions of dollars a year to carry out.
PROP 40
One-time tax on certain taxpayers
5% one-time tax on wealth over $1 billionCreates a one-time 5% tax on certain taxpayers with more than $1 billion in assets. The money would mainly go to health care. It would not count toward school funding requirements or the state spending limit.
- YES
- The state would collect a one-time tax from billionaires equal to 5% of their wealth.
- NO
- The state would not collect this one-time tax.
Cost: Brings in tens of billions of dollars over several years. Possible ongoing income tax loss of less than $1 billion a year.
PROP 41
Limits new taxes outside the spending limit
Also requires audits for new special taxesCancels state taxes passed after January 1, 2026 whose revenue is exempt from the voter-approved state spending limit. It also requires the State Auditor to review programs funded by new special taxes before and after they go to voters.
- YES
- The State Auditor would review programs funded by a voter-proposed tax before it goes on the ballot.
- NO
- The State Auditor's role in reviewing programs would not change.
Cost: Unknown. It depends on future choices by voters and lawmakers.
PROP 42
Bans new personal property and retroactive taxes
Covers assets other than real estateBars new state taxes on owning personal property, meaning anything other than real estate, such as financial assets. It also bars taxes that apply to past activity, and cancels conflicting taxes passed after January 1, 2026.
- YES
- The state could not create new taxes on owning financial assets or other personal property.
- NO
- The state could still choose to create those taxes.
Cost: State tax revenue may not grow as much in the future.
PROP 44
Community health clinic spending rule
Clinics must spend 90% of revenue on servicesPenalizes nonprofit community health centers (Federally Qualified Health Centers) that spend less than 90% of their revenue on program services, including patient care.
- YES
- Certain nonprofit clinics would have to spend at least 90% of their revenue on services each year.
- NO
- The new spending requirement would not take effect.
Cost: State costs rise by low tens of millions of dollars a year, covered by fees.
Official sources
State of California
- Official Voter Information Guide. Full text, the Legislative Analyst's review and arguments for and against each prop. voterguide.sos.ca.gov
- Full guide as a PDF. Secretary of State
- Qualified ballot measures. sos.ca.gov
- Election dates and deadlines. sos.ca.gov
- Check your registration. voterstatus.sos.ca.gov
Sacramento County
- Vote center locations and hours. elections.saccounty.gov
- Voting in person. elections.saccounty.gov
- Voter Registration and Elections. (916) 875-6451 · elections.saccounty.gov
Independent, nonpartisan
- CalMatters Voter Guide. calmatters.org